How Fair Value Gaps Reveal Hidden Institutional Intent

Wiki Article

Among all advanced price-action concepts, Fair Value Gaps stand out as the purest window into where smart money leaves its footprints.

In the framework used by Plazo Sullivan, FVGs are treated as evidence of institutional displacement—and therefore prime zones for high-probability entries.

The Science Behind Fair Value Gaps

An FVG represents an inefficiency—an area where price moved too fast for opposing traders to fill orders.

The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs

Because institutions require massive liquidity, they often leave gaps behind due to the size of their orders.

A Simple, Professional FVG Workflow
Look for Strong Institutional Moves

Displacement confirms that institutional activity caused the imbalance.

Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone

This is the region where price is likely to return.

Patience Creates Precision

Institutions use these pullbacks to reload positions at favorable pricing.

Bias Before Execution

Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital’s bias framework—weekly, daily, liquidity mapping—acts as the filter that upgrades an FVG from “possible” to “high-probability.”

Imbalances Work Both Ways

Just as price gravitates back to FVGs for entries, it also moves toward FVGs when they act as future magnets.

Why FVG Trading Works

Fair Value Gaps give traders a rare glimpse into here algorithmic intent.

Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.

FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.